Economic Value Added (EVA) stands as the premier indicator of wealth creation within a business, factoring in the cost of capital. It effectively aligns the goals of shareholders and managers, avoiding the pitfalls of traditional accounting methods. To leverage EVA for enhancing true economic profit, a business must integrate EVA-centric measurement, incentive, and financial management systems. Without these, assessing the long-term value enhancement of capital is unfeasible. When these systems are in place, EVA becomes the guiding metric for corporate progress, driving the singular aim of improving EVA and, consequently, shareholder wealth.
Valuing a business is a complex task that involves assessing various financial metrics to determine its economic worth. Profitability, as indicated by excess cash flows, is a key factor. Earnings per share (EPS) provide insight into a company's profitability on a per-share basis, while the price/earnings ratio (P/E) compares a company's share price to its earnings, offering a measure of relative value. Other important metrics include return on equity (ROE), return on investment (ROI), and return on net assets (RONA). However, these measures can be distorted by management's accounting practices, which, while legal, can obscure a company's true financial health, especially in the short term. The separation of ownership and control in public companies has further complicated the valuation process. Shareholders, who own the company's shares, may have different objectives from the managers who control the company's operations. Managers possess detailed inside information and may be motivated to maximize their bonuses rather than focusing on dividend payments and stock price appreciation, which are typically the shareholders' primary concerns. Accounting measures, traditionally used to determine a company's residual value in the event of liquidation, are not well-suited for assessing the current economic value of a going concern. Generally accepted accounting practices can distort the true market value of a company. For example, EPS can be manipulated by reducing research and development expenses, engaging in trade loading, taking "big baths" during restructuring to overstate expenses, or creating "cookie jar reserves" by overestimating future liabilities. These practices have led to an increase in mergers and acquisitions during the 1960s and 1970s, as executives sought to grow their compensation through the expansion of business size. The 1980s saw a rise in leveraged buyouts (LBOs), with large acquisitions financed through various debt instruments. However, these strategies often failed to create significant wealth for shareholders and introduced greater financial risk due to the increased debt burden. The need for a more straightforward and flexible approach to creating value is evident. In 2000, a study by Stern Stewart highlighted the effectiveness of Economic Value Added (EVA) as a valuation measure. The study tracked 65 companies that implemented EVA and compared their stock market performance with that of their peers over five years. The result was a 49-percent higher wealth creation for investors in EVA companies compared to investments in similar-sized competitors. This additional wealth amounted to $116 billion, demonstrating the potential of EVA as a tool for valuation. Despite the challenges, many companies still adhere to ethical financial reporting standards. However, a growing number of managers believe that manipulating earnings to meet Wall Street's expectations is acceptable and even part of their responsibility. This perspective is concerning, as it can lead to a misrepresentation of a company's financial health. The original purpose of accounting and audit systems was to ensure stewardship and to manage conflicts of interest between a company's bondholders and shareholders. Companies would report specific information to bondholders to monitor compliance. However, as the business landscape evolves, the principles of economic valuation remain constant. EVA has proven to be a valuable tool for both traditional and new economy companies, providing a sense of rationality to the valuation process. In conclusion, while traditional financial metrics are essential for valuing a business, they must be used with caution due to the potential for manipulation. A clear and rational valuation method is necessary to accurately reflect a company's true value and ensure that management is genuinely creating value over time. EVA has emerged as a promising approach, aligning the interests of managers and shareholders and providing a more accurate measure of a company's economic worth.
book.moreChapters
