
Pivot to the future
Unveiling opportunities, fostering expansion amidst disruption
Description
In today's business landscape, constant disruption is the norm. Accenture's extensive study on thousands of companies reveals that a majority are currently facing disruption, with many at risk of future upheavals.
The optimal strategy is to become an instigator of change rather than a victim. This requires agility and the capacity for continuous transformation. Mastering the art of the 'wise pivot' is crucial for perpetual business reinvention. By adeptly shifting your business to seize new opportunities, you ensure resilience against future shifts.
Growth and future leadership hinge on strategically investing in existing assets, current innovations, and emerging ventures. Omar Abbosh, Paul Nunes, and Larry Downes advocate for relentless reinvention and business rearchitecture to navigate from one prospect to another with speed and efficiency, a concept they term the 'wise pivot'.
Table of contents
01Unlocking trapped value .
In a landscape where market conditions are volatile, the notion of a single, large-scale transformation for a company is no longer sufficient. Instead, what's required is a continuous process of reinvention, with businesses making multiple strategic shifts to seize new opportunities as they arise. The goal is to consistently discover innovative and more effective methods to tap into the latent value that is embedded within the existing business model, and then to realign the company around an optimal combination of both legacy and new assets.
Take the case of Royal Philips in the early 2000s, which foresaw the impending dominance of LED technology over traditional incandescent bulbs. Despite its historical association with and invention of light bulbs, Philips made a strategic pivot. It utilized its established manufacturing, marketing, and distribution capabilities while simultaneously investing in compact fluorescent bulbs as a transitional technology. This move provided marketable products in the short term while Philips intensified its research and development in LEDs. The company strategically divested its incandescent lighting assets to competitors while they still held value. As a result of this pivot, Philips was well-positioned to enter the LED market as a service provider once the technology matured. Moreover, Philips broadened its focus to health technologies, which emerged as its new core business. Despite its long-standing history in lighting, Philips largely withdrew from the industry, exemplifying a classic pivot—selling off the traditional bulb business to finance the next-generation LEDs, and then transitioning to become a high-value health technology provider.
Balancing investments across technologies at varying stages of their life cycles is a complex task but can result in remarkable synergies when executed effectively. As noted by Omar Abbosh, Paul Nunes, and Larry Downes, mastering a wise pivot involves a continuous and bold rotation through the old, the present, and the new. Leaders must regularly reassess and maintain a balance in their investment allocations across these stages, despite the unpredictable nature of market disruptions.
Digital technologies are opening up possibilities to generate new revenue streams from products and services that were previously limited by market inefficiencies. To capitalize on these opportunities, companies must access this trapped value before their competitors do, to fund future growth. This necessitates a shift away from outdated plans, strategies, processes, and systems. Trapped value can manifest in various domains:
At the enterprise level, companies fail to harness new technologies to significantly enhance mundane aspects of business. For instance, Nike collaborates with manufacturers to produce shoe uppers in 30 seconds with 30% less labor, while Adidas employs 3D printing to customize shoes, reducing design time from months to days. Businesses must revise their procedures to take advantage of disruptive technologies.
02Making wise pivots repeatedly
Your innovation
When navigating the terrain of innovation management, there are three pivotal decisions that leaders must confront to steer their organizations towards success.
The first decision revolves around the structure of innovation initiatives: should they be centralized at the corporate headquarters or should innovation be encouraged to emerge organically from individual business units? While centralization can streamline the process of identifying standout ideas, it may overlook valuable insights from those closest to the market. A hybrid approach often yields the best results, leveraging the strengths of both strategies.
The second decision concerns the level of independence granted to research and development (R&D) and corporate venturing teams. Granting full autonomy might lead to the pursuit of projects with no viable future, squandering valuable resources. Conversely, excessive oversight can suppress creative thinking. To navigate this, many organizations opt for internal incubators that support a diverse array of projects, using data-driven evaluations to make informed decisions about further investments.
The third critical decision is the choice between focusing on incremental innovations or aiming for transformative, "moonshot" projects. This requires a thorough analysis of where untapped value exists within the industry, among customers, and in society at large. It also necessitates an understanding of the pace at which the market is evolving. A strategy that includes investments in both areas, with a preference for enhancing current products and services while also exploring new technologies, is often wise.
There is no universal strategy that fits all scenarios. The optimal approach depends on the unique combination of trapped value, available technologies, and strategic objectives specific to each organization. However, several overarching principles are universally applicable: avoid the extremes of too much decentralization or centralization; employ data and clear metrics to drive investment decisions; have a deep understanding of the dynamics within your industry and the rate of change; and allocate resources to both incremental improvements and groundbreaking innovations, adjusting the balance as suits your specific context.
By adopting a balanced approach, organizations can harness the most innovative ideas from across their teams while also advancing the most promising innovations more rapidly than their competitors, positioning themselves for long-term success in an ever-changing landscape.













