Dygest logo
Google logo

Google Play

Apple logo

App Store

Doug Sundheim

Taking smart risks

When we play it safe for too long, stagnation sets in. Avoiding risks leads to forgotten winning feelings, standing still without growth, no creation of better things, and a loss of confidence. Indefinitely staying in our comfort zone means not fully living. To keep growing, we need challenging goals to stretch us - "smart risks". Smart risk taking carefully balances boldness and careful preparation. We undertake meaningful challenges to stretch ourselves but thoroughly minimize hazards involved. It's about getting in the "smart-risk zone" between our comfort zone and the danger zone. Staying in this smart-risk zone takes practice. We must continually find something worth fighting for, envision the future now, act and learn rapidly, communicate powerfully, and create a smart-risk culture. Smart risk taking involves creating anew, self-understanding, confidence, and feeling alive. Losing these by playing safe too long loses life's vibrancy. Despite fear, focusing on the growth, progress, and learning lost without risks helps us find the right risks to take.

Taking smart risks
Taking smart risks

book.chapter Discover your inspiring purpose

Taking smart risks is essential for growth, bridging the gap between stagnation and reckless endangerment. The concept of a "Smart-Risk Zone" lies at the heart of this approach, positioned strategically between the Comfort Zone, where certainty and ease prevail, and the Danger Zone, characterized by the uncertainties of trying new things. This middle ground is crucial for leaders aiming to drive their enterprises forward without falling into the trap of complacency or excessive risk. Traditionally, organizations operate within the dichotomy of comfort and danger zones. The comfort zone is a space of routine and predictability, while the danger zone represents the uncharted territory of innovation and change. However, this binary perspective is limiting and can lead to a resistance to change due to various fears: the timing might not seem right, ideas may appear underdeveloped, the fear of failure looms large, and the potential for costly mistakes deters action. Moreover, the regret of failing can often overshadow the regret of inaction. To counteract this paralysis, envisioning a third zone—the Smart-Risk Zone—is vital. This zone encourages piloting new initiatives that could catalyze future growth. Embracing this mindset means accepting that timing will never be perfect, ideas can evolve through action, and hands-on experience is invaluable. Experimentation is not just a pathway to growth; it's a necessity for staying relevant and competitive. Doug Sundheim highlights the concept of loss aversion to explain the importance of taking risks. By playing it safe, organizations risk a gradual decline in energy, creativity, and vitality. The dangers of inaction are as real as those of reckless action. Smart risk-taking, therefore, involves a balanced approach of planning, testing, learning, and communicating. This process helps minimize uncertainty at every stage, making risks smarter and more calculated. Bill Marris of Google Ventures illustrates this point by describing their investment strategy as one of systematic risk reduction. What may appear risky from the outside is, in fact, a series of smart bets underpinned by thorough analysis and planning. Sundheim further explains that smart risk-taking is more about methodical planning and experimentation over time than about making impulsive decisions. It's about derisking at each stage, reflecting a set of observable behaviors rather than inherent personality traits. Historical figures like John F. Kennedy and Helen Keller have also emphasized the greater risks and costs associated with inaction compared to those of taking action. George S. Patton made a distinction between calculated risks and rashness, underscoring the importance of reducing uncertainty through careful analysis before proceeding. This preparation transforms risks into intelligent experiments rather than blind leaps.

book.moreChapters

allBooks.title